← Search

Sarah Brown

— year-end
30 matches · 16W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-03-14 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marjorie Gale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-08-16 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Thornburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-08-02 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Thornburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-06-16 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Thornburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2023-07-22 · EE:Dare Doubles:Gale/Van Kleeck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-07-16 · EE:Dare Doubles:Gale/Van Kleeck · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2023-05-18 · EE:Dare Doubles:Gale/Van Kleeck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Sabalis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2022-06-12 · EE:Vankleeck/Gale · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marjorie Gale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2022-06-10 · EE:Vankleeck/Gale · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-05-21 · EE:Vankleeck/Gale · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2022-03-19 · ESB:Net Force One:Strausser · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Magee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-02-05 · ESB:Net Force One:Strausser · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with THOMAS TWITCHELL mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
Teams11 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 50.6% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.2% of games
8.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.6% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 60.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova