← Search

Dave Keim

Meridian, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 52W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dave Keim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Bangers 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jake Putnam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
Daniel Reed / Howard Williams
2026-08-25 · Bangers 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Malmstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · Bangers 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · Bangers 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russell Moorhead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Bangers 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russell Moorhead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · Bangers 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russell Moorhead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · Old Faulters · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roger Quarles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · Miller Time · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Harbst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · Miller Time · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Massie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · Old Faulters · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · Miller Time · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Harbst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · Old Faulters · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dit Dudley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
29.9%
29W–68L · 44.7% of games
4.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 40.2% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 55.4% of games
8.0
34.3%
12W–23L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
44 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert