← Search

Wallace Eastwood

Meridian, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
227 matches · 101W–126L · seasons 2016–2026

Captains: add Wallace Eastwood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history227 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Backhanded Compliments · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Fields mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-24 · Backhanded Compliments · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karlie Braseth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Backhanded Compliments · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Fields mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Backhanded Compliments · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Sloop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Ace Holes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Angstman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Ace Holes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Lundstedt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · Ace Holes · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-06-17 · Massive Rackets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Lundstedt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · Massive Rackets · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-11 · Ace Holes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Angstman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-04 · Ace Holes · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-03 · Massive Rackets · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Lundstedt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
55%
11W–9L · 53.3% of games
4.0
45.5%
25W–30L · 49.2% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.7% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.4% of games
7.5mixed
45.5%
15W–18L · 49.3% of games
8.0mixed
42.2%
19W–26L · 45.6% of games
8.5mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 41% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 32.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
41 matches
#1 Singles
16%
37 matches
#2 Singles
14%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer