← Search

Jeff Kinzler

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 37W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeff Kinzler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-08-26 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Ferry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-19 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Bach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Malinzak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Bach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Bach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Bach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-15 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Malinzak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randal Ankeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Chin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-03 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randal Ankeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-26 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Jelinek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
64.9%
24W–13L · 54.9% of games
4.0
18.8%
9W–39L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert