← Search

Michael Nobles

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 71W–79L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Michael Nobles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-09-02 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kendall Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-26 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kendall Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
Miles Lee / Gabrielle Mattioda
2026-08-23 · DPR-RP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hilaria Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-06 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kendall Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · DPR-RP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hilaria Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-29 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-26 · DPR-RP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heather Leong Hulstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-22 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-05 · BP RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elisa Dannemiller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Chin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
42.9%
36W–48L · 47.4% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
20W–15L · 53.9% of games
8.5mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
24 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King