← Search

Philip Kalafut

— year-end
36 matches · 16W–20L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Philip Kalafut to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-08-04 · Hunters Green Fees/Warren · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dwight Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · Hunters Green Fees/Warren · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dwight Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-16 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Livingston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-08 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-02 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · Hunters Green / M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · Hunters Green Goop - M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Kranick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-28 · Hunters Green Goop - M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Randrianarison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · Hunters Green Goop - M. Warren · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Friday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-01-17 · Hunters Green Goop - M. Warren · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Kranick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2025-10-18 · Green Hunter Games X - M. Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Friday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 55.1% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 35.6% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 44.3% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams