← Search

James Schneider

— year-end
24 matches · 14W–10L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add James Schneider to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-09-12 · HCC Thunder & Lightning/Halm · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johnny Fung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-29 · HCC Thunder & Lightning/Halm · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicholas Oppenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Justin Li / Steven Swygert
2026-08-26 · HCC Thunder & Lightning/Halm · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicholas Oppenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · HCC Thunder & Lightning/Halm · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Ponraj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · PINELLAS/Halm · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Ponraj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · PINELLAS/Halm · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mony Rodon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-30 · HILLS/Schneider · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Munch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · HILLS/Schneider · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Max Collazo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · PINELLAS/Halm · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Ponraj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · HILLS/Schneider · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Conston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · HILLS/Schneider · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Conston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-04 · PINELLAS/Halm · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Ponraj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Teams67 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.8% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 35.5% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 61.3% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 42.5% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova