← Search

Sherry Bunn

— year-end
85 matches · 41W–44L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Sherry Bunn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Galbraith/Averett-GI · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Borom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-29 · Lawrence/Lynch-GI · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Borom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Lynch/Walters-GI · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leah Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-02 · Lynch/Walters-GI · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kecia Cawthorne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jamie Smith / Helen Powell
2026-07-26 · Lynch/Walters-GI · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Greeff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · Lynch/Walters-GI · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hae Jin Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-05 · Galbraith/Bunn-GI · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kay Gantt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Galbraith/Bunn-GI · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Goldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-30 · Galbraith/Bunn-GI · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-12 · Roebuck-GI · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lloyd Pease
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-11 · Galbraith/Bunn-GI · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Borom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · Galbraith/Bunn-GI · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Borom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams61 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
54%
34W–29L · 52.2% of games
4.0
20%
2W–8L · 39.1% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.9% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer