← Search

Hae Jin Kim

Columbus, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 44W–27L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Hae Jin Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Walters-GI · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigh Kosobucki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-31 · Salzgeber/Champion-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gena Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-30 · Walters-GI · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · Walters-GI · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Pezold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-23 · Walters-GI · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · Salzgeber/Champion-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria McKernan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · Lynch/Walters-GI · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Virginia Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · Lynch/Walters-GI · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sherry Bunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · Lynch/Walters-GI · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Streeton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · CORTA/Scott Ammerman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Galbraith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-12 · CORTA/Scott Ammerman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sun Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-07 · Hale-CC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 61.9% of games
3.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 51.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 47.8% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova