← Search

Mary Leigh Burnette

— year-end
43 matches · 29W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mary Leigh Burnette to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-05-02 · Cramer/Burnette/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kala Cramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-02 · Cramer/Burnette/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hurt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · Cramer/Burnette/BP · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hurt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · Cramer/Burnette/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betty Hurt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-25 · Jones/Cramer/JNB/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vickie Huckaby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · Cramer/Burnette/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vickie Huckaby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · Jones/Cramer/JNB/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vickie Huckaby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Jones/Cramer/JNB/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vickie Huckaby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · Jones/Cramer/JNB/BP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vickie Huckaby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-07 · Jones/Cramer/JNB/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vickie Huckaby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-19 · Dickson/Worrell/LRAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Worrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-19 · Dickson/Worrell/LRAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Breeding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
63.6%
21W–12L · 58.1% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.7% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer