← Search

Hope Rider

Maumelle, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 33W–62L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Hope Rider to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-08-11 · Bartlett/Lakewood/STC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Baird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · Junior/LR/OC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Fletcher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-29 · Bartlett/Lakewood/STC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Gammill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Junior/LR/OC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Rider mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-21 · Bartlett/Lakewood/STC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Baird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-01 · Junior/LR/OC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Rider mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Bartlett/Lakewood/STC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Grace Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · Junior/LR/OC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Rider mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-08 · Junior/LR/OC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Rider mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-12 · Stewart/LR/OC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-30 · Stewart/LR/OC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-04-26 · Stone/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Childers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
41%
16W–23L · 47.1% of games
4.0
20%
5W–20L · 37.4% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.1% of games
3.5mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#1 Singles
22%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#2 Singles
7%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova