← Search

James Baltz

Perrysburg, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 46W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Baltz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-09-14 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Firestone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Firestone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
Kevin Webb / James Aston
2026-09-09 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Ammons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-31 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Mathewson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-26 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Firestone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-17 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-23 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Dammeier/Green-FT · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Travis Baltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Firestone/Foukes-FT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Josh von Lehmden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Mike Williams / Kristopher Keating
2026-07-06 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Firestone/Foukes-FT · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Smeltzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Firestone/Foukes-FT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary LeSage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Firestone/Foukes-FT · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Firestone/Foukes-FT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradley Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
48.5%
32W–34L · 48.7% of games
4.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 30.2% of games
7.0
34.2%
13W–25L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
30 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert