← Search

Daniel Firestone

Waterville, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 70W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Daniel Firestone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-09-14 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Baltz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Baltz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-09 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Mathewson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-31 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Ammons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-26 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Baltz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-17 · NWO 65&Over 7.0M Baltz-FT · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Mathewson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Dammeier/Green-FT · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Dammeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-20 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Firestone/Foukes-FT · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Gottschalk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Firestone/Foukes-FT · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregory Barasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Firestone/Foukes-FT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Dammeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
Chuck Rigoulot / Andrew Morgan
2026-06-04 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Dammeier/Green-FT · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Josh von Lehmden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-01 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Firestone/Foukes-FT · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary LeSage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
63.6%
56W–32L · 54.6% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
23.3%
10W–33L · 43.4% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
32 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams