← Search

Wendy Cressman

— year-end
80 matches · 38W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Wendy Cressman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-07-27 · 55 7.0W E PM Lengel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Fatula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · 55 7.0W E PM Lengel · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Eardley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · A40 3.5W PM1 Lorenzo-Pazgan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Eardley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-22 · 55 7.0W E PM Lengel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Eardley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · A40 3.5W PM1 Lorenzo-Pazgan · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · 55 7.0W E PM Lengel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Lengel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · 55 7.0W E PM Lengel · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Eardley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-05-26 · A40 3.5W PM1 Lorenzo-Pazgan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonita Teeuwen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-18 · 55 7.0W E PM Lengel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Fatula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · A40 3.5W PM1 Lorenzo-Pazgan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Skidmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-11 · 55 7.0W E PM Lengel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mona Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-07-22 · A55 7.0W 2 PM Lengel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Fogel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
58%
29W–21L · 52.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 26.5% of games
7.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 43.6% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer