← Search

Mona Davis

— year-end
100 matches · 50W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mona Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-07-15 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Lengel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · 55 7.0W E PM Lengel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Lengel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristina Dillon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · A18 4.0W PM Lorenzo-Pazgan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcela Nicolae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · A40 3.5W PM1 Lorenzo-Pazgan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Lynch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · 55 7.0W E PM Lengel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Fatula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · A18 4.0W PM Lorenzo-Pazgan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · A40 3.5W PM1 Lorenzo-Pazgan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Skidmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · 55 7.0W E PM Lengel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonita Teeuwen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-10 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Bloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
67.9%
19W–9L · 58.2% of games
4.0
18.2%
4W–18L · 36.7% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova