← Search

Claire Corts

Charleston, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 12W–20L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Claire Corts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2025-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4
L
2025-11-13 · LCTA18/Smoak/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Elizabeth Murray / Shelley Keller
2025-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-11-06 · LCTA18/Smoak/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Linker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-02 · LCTA18/Smoak/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-25 · LCTA18/Smoak/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-18 · LCTA18/Smoak/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-09-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Boo Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-08-06 · LCTA18/Smoak/CTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Bruch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Renie Forsberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
35.7%
10W–18L · 45.1% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova