← Search

Lyman Brown

Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
388 matches · 183W–205L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lyman Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history388 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Avalon Ghita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Richman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-06 · Woodlake Patterson · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Fort Battad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-30 · Avalon Ghita 7.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeremy Falk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-30 · Woodlake Patterson · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tanner Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-29 · Woodlake Patterson · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Cabral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · Avalon Ghita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Richman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-23 · Woodlake Patterson · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tanner Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · Avalon Ghita 7.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Avalon Ghita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Richman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-15 · Woodlake Patterson · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ken Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-13 · MAC - Haynes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Haynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-07 · Avalon Ghita 7.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gabriel Ghita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
45.7%
75W–89L · 49.9% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 38.5% of games
7.0
58.6%
17W–12L · 53.3% of games
7.5
46.4%
13W–15L · 50.5% of games
8.0
59.6%
28W–19L · 51.9% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.2% of games
9.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 52.5% of games
7.5mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 45.7% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
15W–18L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
141 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
138 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
97 matches
#2 Singles
2%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova