← Search

Brian Rabhan

Richmond, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 33W–18L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Brian Rabhan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-09-14 · WW-8.5 Ninjas - Baker · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Todd Prince
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Jeff Bosch / Alex Neuwelt
2026-09-08 · WW-8.5 Ninjas - Baker · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ryan Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-06 · WW-8.5 Ninjas - Baker · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Todd Prince
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · WW-8.5 Ninjas - Baker · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Robert Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · WW - Prince/Rabhan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackson Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · WW - Prince/Rabhan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Cecil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-02 · WW-8.5 Ninjas - Baker · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Todd Prince
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · WW-8.5 Ninjas - Baker · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Todd Prince
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Pilc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · WW - Prince/Rabhan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Stafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
60%
18W–12L · 54.6% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 63.9% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#1 Singles
12%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer