← Search

Terry Largent

— year-end
165 matches · 100W–65L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Terry Largent to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
L
2026-05-16 · OKWC/Wood/55&over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wendy Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · Watling/SH 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · OKWC/Wood/55&over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amanda Scroggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-06 · Watling/SH 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zahidah Hyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · OK/Eaton/Tulsa · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jo Clark championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-02 · OK/Eaton/Tulsa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daryl Eaton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-01 · OK/Eaton/Tulsa · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Ames championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-30 · OK/Eaton/Tulsa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daryl Eaton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · Fraser/PH 65s 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jo Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · Shadid/SH 55s 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zahidah Hyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · Fraser/PH 65s 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · Fraser/PH 65s 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 53% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
64.6%
51W–28L · 52.6% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 41.5% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
61.7%
29W–18L · 57.6% of games
8.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer