← Search

Cheryl Willis

Jenks, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 116W–101L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Cheryl Willis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Millington/GR/Day4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Crowder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-01 · Edgar/LF/Day3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catrina Edgar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · Corley/GR/tri 3.5 DAY · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catrina Edgar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · Crowder/LF/tri 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cindy Crowder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · Crowder/LF/tri 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amanda Kilian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Corley/GR/tri 3.5 DAY · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catrina Edgar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · Crowder/LF/tri 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cindy Crowder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-10 · Corley/GR/tri 3.5 DAY · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catrina Edgar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · Crowder/LF/tri 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristen Schooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Crowder/LF/18s 4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Salem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-16 · Steinke/LF 55s 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · Whitten 55s 8.0 /LF · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Whitten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
60.5%
23W–15L · 58.9% of games
3.0
38.3%
18W–29L · 47.9% of games
3.5
56.9%
41W–31L · 53.7% of games
4.0
37%
10W–17L · 44% of games
7.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 60.7% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 60.1% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
62 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert