← Search

Margie Ann Jones

— year-end
13 matches · 5W–8L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Margie Ann Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history13 matches
L
2026-09-05 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy Orr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Rebecca Williams / Myriam Owens
2026-07-25 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Rayfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer DeCamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-08-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy Orr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-03-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Ewald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2024-02-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-01-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2023-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Pittard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-08-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melinda Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2023-03-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 56.5% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova