← Search

Jennifer DeCamp

Johns Island, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 40W–50L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jennifer DeCamp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-09-13 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-05 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Rayfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-0
W
2026-08-22 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deborah Ott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy Bruce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · LCTA55/Gillespie/Seabrook · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Gannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-06 · LCTA55/Gillespie/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Gannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Stebbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-10-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Margie Ann Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
49.3%
34W–35L · 51.6% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 53.1% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal