← Search

Nancy Butts Foy

— year-end
185 matches · 78W–107L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nancy Butts Foy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
W
2026-09-12 · LATA 55/Graczyk/CAMP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Missy Graczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-09 · LATA40/RANGEL/CAMP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Traci Gilden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · LATA40/RANGEL/CAMP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leslie Downs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-24 · LATA40/Saleeby/SSP · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathryn Sandifer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-15 · LATA 55/Graczyk/CAMP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Missy Graczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · LATA40/RANGEL/CAMP · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Wild
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · LATA40/RANGEL/CAMP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisette Geib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · LATA40/Saleeby/SSP · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Staci Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · CTL55/Taylor/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robbin Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · CTL55/Taylor/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-25 · LATA 55/Graczyk/CAMP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susie Leroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · LATA40/RANGEL/CAMP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Traci Gilden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams67 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
40%
52W–78L · 47.5% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 28.8% of games
7.5
46.9%
15W–17L · 50.2% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 52% of games
4.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
44 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova