← Search

Emilee McLauchlin

Lexington, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 48W–23L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Emilee McLauchlin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-09-08 · LATA18/Piper/CAMP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendel Franklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-03 · LATA18/Heaberlin/LCTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Staci Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-02 · LATA40-Taylor-SSP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beverly Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · LATA18/Heaberlin/LCTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shannon Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · LATA40/Gore/SSP · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ivana Gearheart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · LATA40-Taylor-SSP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beverly Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · LATA18/Heaberlin/LCTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Staci Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-27 · LATA40/Gore/SSP · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katie Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · LATA40/Bigg/LCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Penland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-06-11 · LATA40/Bigg/LCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oliver Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · LATA40/Bigg/LCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Penland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · CTL40/Taylor/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Mizzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
76.5%
39W–12L · 59.9% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.6% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 49.3% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer