← Search

Courtney Rosenthal

Bradenton, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 21W–20L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Courtney Rosenthal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-08-25 · TLC Nice Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colleen Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-2
L
2026-08-19 · TLC Nice Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Weitekamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Mary Wilson / Carrie Carretta
2026-08-13 · LBK Public Smashers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Wendy Hillock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · TLC Nice Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Rosenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Cindy Rosenberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Tanya Keith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
Lauren Stevenson
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-04 · Laurel Oak Lunch Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alicia Cohler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-3
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Cindy Rosenberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · Laurel Oak Lunch Ladies · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jan Sutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.8% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
11 matches
#1 Singles
17%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert