← Search

Kim Reiser

Bradenton, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 111W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Reiser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Payne Park Wilson Trilevel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Beene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Wild Blue Wild Cards · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karen Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-12 · Payne Park Wilson Trilevel · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annmarie Curle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · Payne Park Wilson Trilevel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Finman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Payne Park Wilson Trilevel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Finman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · Payne Park Wilson Trilevel · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Keyser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · Wild Blue Wild Cards · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Anne Mcdonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Wild Blue Mixed · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Putrino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · Wild Blue Mixed · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Louis Laginess mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · River Strand Rallycats · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Franklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · River Strand Ready · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Franklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-26 · River Strand Ready · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Beene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
63.5%
73W–42L · 56.2% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
9W–3L · 56% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
75%
9W–3L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 51.3% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.6% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
17 matches
#1 Singles
6%
10 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer