← Search

Joanna Goldin

Califon, NJ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 112W–54L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Joanna Goldin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
L
2026-05-29 · NJ: West Orange · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Margaret Toth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-29 · Rygh · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Hearn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
Jill Olman / Jennifer Smith
2026-04-15 · Rygh · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Hearn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-06-27 · NJ: West Orange · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cecilia Tammling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-06 · NJ: West Orange · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joyce O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-04 · Rygh · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Martha Land
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-28 · Rygh · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Carey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-21 · Rygh · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-02 · NJ: West Orange · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cecilia Tammling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2023-08-18 · #3 Doubles · with Rika Sabinsky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-27 · Danieli · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Courtney Baiardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-3, 1-0
L
Chari McClary - (DQ)* / Claudia Webster
2023-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with JANET van MOL
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
86.1%
68W–11L · 63.5% of games
4.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 49.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.9% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 41.3% of games
8.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 57.7% of games
9.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe