← Search

Bob Ripp

— year-end
23 matches · 10W–13L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Bob Ripp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
Matt Badger / Chris Moore
2022-07-01 · CSU · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-06-24 · CSU · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-06-10 · CSU · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Tyler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2022-06-01 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Rubin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Kevin McCrary / Chris Moore
2022-05-27 · CSU · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Leydens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-0
W
2022-05-25 · CSU GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Wehmeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2022-05-20 · CSU · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Tyler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2022-05-18 · CSU GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Rubin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2022-04-27 · CSU GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Wehmeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2019-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Daigle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2019-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2019-07-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gordon Motley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Teams3 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
50%
6W–6L · 50.7% of games
8.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert