← Search

Anne Marie Hinkle

Toledo, OH
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 7W–14L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Anne Marie Hinkle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
L
2024-06-24 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Turner/Assenmacher-Inverness · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mina Naik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-05-20 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Turner/Assenmacher-Inverness · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Racquel Lorenzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-06 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Turner/Assenmacher-Inverness · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mina Naik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2020-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Abendroth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Amy Graff / Jennifer Elliott
2020-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashlee Assenmacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2019-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Mohan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2019-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annsley Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2019-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Wagoner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2019-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2019-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mina Naik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Rebecca Chen
2019-06-03 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2019-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mina Naik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 43.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 31% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
2 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams