← Search

Sarah Norr

Monclova, OH
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
193 matches · 141W–52L · seasons 2016–2022

Captains: add Sarah Norr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
W
2022-06-23 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W LaPointe/Nixon-TTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-5
W
2022-06-09 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W LaPointe/Nixon-TTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Reichert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2022-06-02 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W LaPointe/Nixon-TTC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-05-26 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W LaPointe/Nixon-TTC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
Jen Sanderson / Jennifer Walton
2022-01-23 · #3 Doubles · with Nina Rettig championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2021-11-06 · NWO Combo 7.5W Szczechowski · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jackie Kapuscinski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-2
W
2021-10-23 · NWO Combo 7.5W Szczechowski · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nina Rettig
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2021-10-09 · NWO Combo 7.5W Szczechowski · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dede Zeiger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-4
L
2021-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2021-07-27 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Ward/Cameron-TTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2021-07-15 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W LaPointe/Norr-TTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2021-07-12 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Day Szczechowski -AW · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
80.7%
71W–17L · 61.5% of games
4.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.1% of games
7.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 60.5% of games
8.5
70%
14W–6L · 60.6% of games
8.0mixed
81.8%
18W–4L · 62.8% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
46 matches
#1 Singles
12%
23 matches
#2 Singles
8%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert