← Search

Craig Warner

Berea, OH
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 134W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Craig Warner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history199 matches
L
2026-04-24 · A18 4.0M GR Canadas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wilfred Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-10 · A18 4.0M GR Canadas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wilfred Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Ben Klisan / Brian Travers
2026-03-27 · A18 4.0M GR Canadas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wilfred Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-10 · X55 7.0 NC Cho · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeannette Cho mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-03 · X55 7.0 NC Cho · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Rich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-19 · X55 7.0 NC Cho · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Zimmermann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2024-11-24 · X55 7.0 NC Currier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Cheverine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-19 · X55 7.0 NC Currier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Cheverine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-09-21 · X55 7.0 NC Currier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Rich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-04-14 · X40 7.0 PM1 Meisenbach · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Meisenbach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-04-11 · OH NEO A65 7.0M Bassak · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Woods
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-04-04 · OH NEO A65 7.0M Bassak · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Woods
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
78.9%
30W–8L · 62.3% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.6% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
85.3%
29W–5L · 63.7% of games
6.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.3% of games
7.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 51.8% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
88%
22W–3L · 64.3% of games
7.0mixed
54.7%
29W–24L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
113 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
25 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe