← Search

Bonnie Mann

Phenix City, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 79W–53L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Bonnie Mann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Chandler-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca DeLoach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · Chandler-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christy Bates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · Chandler-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Liza Hollingsworth / Julie Johnson
2026-08-15 · DeLoach-CC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amber Harden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · Kirkland-CC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexis Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · DeLoach-CC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amber Harden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-10 · Kirkland-CC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julie Cronise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Kirkland-CC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Annie Kirkland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · DeLoach-CC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Victoria Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Kirkland-CC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-20 · Kirkland-CC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Wampler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · DeLoach-CC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams86 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 60% of games
4.0
62.4%
63W–38L · 55.8% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 20% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 56.2% of games
8.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova