← Search

Crawford Knox

Columbus, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 36W–6L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Crawford Knox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-08-10 · Wendel-CC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madelyn Boren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · Wendel-CC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Barbara Lowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Wendel-CC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madelyn Boren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Casion-CCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Parmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · CORTA/Alexis Chandler · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dalton Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · Casion-CCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Parmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Jeremy Morris / Jennifer Boyd
2026-06-03 · CORTA/Alexis Chandler · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Swords
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · Casion-CCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Boykin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-01 · Chandler-CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Dunlevie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-28 · Chandler-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Dunlevie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-07 · Chandler-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Casion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-01 · Chandler-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Casion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
83.3%
30W–6L · 62.3% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe