← Search

Teri Scaggs

Champaign, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 129W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Teri Scaggs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Beth Hoag championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Beth Hoag championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-15 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hoag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hoag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Caroline Cox / Charles Sikora
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sung Min Moon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
Ginny Kerwin / Evan Aleman
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sung Min Moon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Dallapiazza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hoag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Amber Ehrlich / Jay Oliveira
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christian Sarol mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-06-10 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Dallapiazza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Podeschi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-02-08 · MSIL 7.5 Winter Combo Mixed Wang-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lijian Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
4.0
72.2%
26W–10L · 60.7% of games
4.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.2% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
93.1%
27W–2L · 69.4% of games
8.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 47.8% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 55.3% of games
0.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 65.4% of games
7.5mixed
100%
11W–0L · 74.6% of games
8.0mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 51.4% of games
9.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
43 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova