← Search

Tamara Banks

— year-end
64 matches · 31W–33L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Tamara Banks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-08-21 · RN-BLOODWORTH · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carla Maples
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · RN-MESERVEY · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · RN-MESERVEY · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Hartley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · RN - Smith (MXD 40) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-25 · RN-Bloodworth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Meservey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-2
L
2026-03-15 · RN-MESSERVEY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Rubanov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-12 · RN Bloodworth · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Meservey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-25 · RN Bloodworth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Roller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-08 · RN-MESSERVEY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Roller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-28 · RN - Smith 4.0 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rodney Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-12-10 · RN-BLOODWORTH · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Diane Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · RN - Smith 4.0 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Dudas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Teams44 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
74.1%
20W–7L · 59.1% of games
4.0
31.2%
10W–22L · 44% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer