← Search

Sally Velasquez

— year-end
67 matches · 47W–20L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Sally Velasquez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
2026-09-11 · RN-BLOODWORTH · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Roller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · RN-BLOODWORTH · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Wilcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
Jennifer Heller / Becca McLeod
2026-08-21 · RN-BLOODWORTH · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Windy Dehem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · HOCO-BENDALL · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valerie Beaman-Hackle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-8
L
2026-08-10 · HOCO-REYNOLDS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · HOCO-REYNOLDS · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marian Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · HOCO-REYNOLDS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marian Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-22 · HOCO-REYNOLDS · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · HOCO-REYNOLDS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Luann Causey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Christine Epps / Jennifer Heller
2026-03-30 · RN-Bloodworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Wilcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-25 · RS-COHEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Epps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-17 · HOCO-WHARTON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Folsom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
Teams46 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
73.7%
42W–15L · 58.1% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 53.5% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova