← Search

Mark Schlecker

New Rochelle, NY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 103W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark Schlecker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
L
Patrick O'Toole / Adam Lewczuk
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Marc Lowitz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Matthew Kendall championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Marc Lowitz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Marc Lowitz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · DiChiara/Owen · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Gerald Dichiara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-13 · #2 Doubles · with Andreas Landgrebe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Southern: CRRC 18+ 4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marc Lowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · Low/Moramarco · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vladi Tsipenyuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · DiChiara/Owen · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Dillon McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Will Li - (DQ)* / Timothy Duong
2026-06-28 · Low/Moramarco · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andreas Landgrebe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · Southern: CRRC 18+ 4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andreas Landgrebe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-16 · DiChiara/Owen · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Gerald Dichiara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
75.9%
44W–14L · 62% of games
5.0
40%
4W–6L · 46.8% of games
10.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.6% of games
9.0mixed
73.2%
30W–11L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 69% of the time
#1 Doubles
69%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal