← Search

Pam Kerr

— year-end
130 matches · 67W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pam Kerr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-05-31 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Levens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-17 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Hooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-15 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Manion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-01 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Delane Cohen / Anne Miller
2026-04-24 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Manion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nora Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-22 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Bazzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nora Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-06-14 · Meigs, Barbara · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Bazzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-11 · Meigs, Barbara · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nora Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-07 · Meigs, Barbara · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tara Gatti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-06-06 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Muriel Hull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
48.8%
42W–44L · 48.4% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
58.5%
24W–17L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert