← Search

Mary Thornton

— year-end
182 matches · 81W–101L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Thornton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
W
2026-08-23 · Wang, Yunxia · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Mikel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · Wang, Yunxia · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Maria Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-14 · Jacelone, Marcia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Flattery-Aaron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · Jacelone, Marcia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-22 · Luchtel, MaryAnn · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marla Lovinggood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-01 · Luchtel, MaryAnn · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Norma Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Delane Cohen / Anne Miller
2026-04-12 · Jacelone, Marcia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Geick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-15 · Nelson, Cydney · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · North, Laura · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Stelzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-08 · North, Laura · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Stelzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-06 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Yaple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-20 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Boushka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams39 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.6% of games
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 58.1% of games
4.0
43.3%
61W–80L · 45.2% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 67.1% of games
8.0
35%
7W–13L · 43.7% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
53 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer