← Search

Janis Bark

Vergennes, VT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 42W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janis Bark to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-07-19 · MIT:Senioritas:Bark · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Spears
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-21 · MIT:Senioritas:Bark · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nanette Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-05-31 · MIT:Senioritas:Bark · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · MIT:Senioritas:Bark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heather Potter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-21 · MIT:Match.Net:Marshall · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Schoen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-14 · MIT:Match.Net:Marshall · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Schoen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
Edye Graning / Anne Joseph
2025-07-12 · MIT:Salut:Bark · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sara Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-14 · MIT:Salut:Bark · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Spears
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-18 · MIT:Salut:Bark · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-10 · MIT:Salut:Bark · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-19 · MIT:Match.net:Marshall · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Justin Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-04-13 · MIT:Love Means Nothing:Dunn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Saudade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 47.7% of games
4.0
32.4%
11W–23L · 42.3% of games
7.0
64%
16W–9L · 56% of games
8.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 43.4% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
11.8%
2W–15L · 34.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal