← Search

Gretchen Fougere

New London, NH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 40W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Gretchen Fougere to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-06-30 · MTS:Donahue:Scharpf · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judith Pevear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-16 · MTS:Donahue:Scharpf · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Putnam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-16 · MTS:Fougere:Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-8
L
2026-05-16 · MTS:Fougere:Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-8
L
2026-03-31 · MTS:Scharpf:Saghir · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judith Pevear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-21 · OC:Mix and Match:Maislen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Fokas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · OC:Mix and Match:Maislen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mridul Sen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-29 · MTS:Donahue:Scharpf · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-18 · BOSS:Stan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Parenti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-01-15 · MTS:Donahue:Scharpf · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Saghir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-11-30 · BOSS:Stan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Parenti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-11-25 · MTS:Scharpf:Saghir · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Valeri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 57.5% of games
3.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 45.7% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 72.9% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
30.4%
7W–16L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert