← Search

David Richardson

Fairview, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 61W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Richardson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-05-24 · CAC-Lewis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · CAC-Lewis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Eliason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-02 · CAC-Lewis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · CAC-Lewis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · CAC-Lewis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-04 · CAC-Lewis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-22 · CAC-Lee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Hoang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · CAC-Lee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Hoang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-02-14 · CAC-Lee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheng Saechao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · CAC-Lee · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Hoang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-01 · CAC-Lee · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheng Saechao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-10 · CAC-Lee · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Hoang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
60.2%
50W–33L · 52.1% of games
8.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#1 Singles
13%
13 matches
#2 Singles
9%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer