← Search

Mark King

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 95W–58L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Mark King to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
W
2026-09-12 · IRV-Lux · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Lux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Kristen Kopack championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · GLVR-Kopack · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Kopack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-08 · GLVR-Kopack · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Kopack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-07 · GLVR-Kopack · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Kopack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-01 · GLVR-Kopack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with May Albano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Broken String · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Damon Ogden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Broken String · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Quisling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · GLVR-Kopack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Farrelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rebecca Jacobs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-24 · GLVR-Kopack · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Kopack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-23 · Broken String · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Lux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2004–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
76%
19W–6L · 64.2% of games
4.0
52.5%
21W–19L · 50.8% of games
4.5
25%
3W–9L · 44.3% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
94.7%
18W–1L · 69.8% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
55.6%
20W–16L · 54.5% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
23 matches
#1 Singles
10%
15 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe