← Search

Amanda Teat

Phenix City, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 22W–16L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Amanda Teat to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Ha-CC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanene Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-05 · Teat-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gwen Cogar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · Teat-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melodie Broderick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · Teat-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gwen Cogar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · Teat-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn English
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-06 · Teat-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gwen Cogar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-23 · Teat-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-16 · Teat-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Belinda Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-17 · Jones/Austin-CC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-04-14 · Jones/Austin-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-04-12 · Jones/Austin-CC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pauline Marth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-05 · Jones/Austin-CC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
57.9%
22W–16L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#1 Singles
13%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer