← Search

Gwen Cogar

Phenix City, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 15W–12L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Gwen Cogar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Ha-CC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · Teat-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Teat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · Teat-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Belinda Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · Teat-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Teat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · Teat-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Teat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · Teat-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Belinda Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-26 · Brena-CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Coyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Haesook Joo / Jamie Williams
2025-10-20 · Brena-CC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Wiggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-10-07 · Brena-CC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Vickery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-28 · Brena-CC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-22 · Juestel-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leco Hutson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-15 · Juestel-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leco Hutson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 53.7% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
12 matches
#1 Singles
26%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert