← Search

Gene Higa

Aiea, HI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 46W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gene Higa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-05-03 · Latecomers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gerald Noda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-15 · Latecomers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darrell Zane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-05 · Latecomers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Chun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-29 · Latecomers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nemesio Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-28 · Latecomers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Spencer Nishimura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-26 · Latecomers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harris Okazaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · Latecomers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nemesio Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Latecomers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carl Yamaguchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-07 · Latecomers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Milton Kishaba
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-05 · Latecomers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harris Okazaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · Latecomers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nemesio Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-14 · Latecomers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Vermeesch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
39.4%
37W–57L · 45.7% of games
7.0
22.6%
7W–24L · 41.8% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert