← Search

Richard Leclerc

— year-end
132 matches · 63W–69L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Richard Leclerc to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-04-29 · KRC Court Jesters · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jack Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · KRC Court Jesters · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Mannle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · KRC Court Jesters · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Manz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · KRC 3.5 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terrance Revere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · We call foot faults · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Taratko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-06 · We call foot faults · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Reid Fukuya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · KRC 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Landau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · We call foot faults · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicolas Longpre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-18 · We call foot faults · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jakub Zielkiewicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
James Longbotham / Robert Stovall
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · with Taylor Poole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
Tim Allard / Timothy Feller
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · with Ken Kimi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · with Taylor Poole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 58.9% of games
3.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 52.6% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.7% of games
6.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 60.9% of games
7.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.4% of games
6.0mixed
45.5%
10W–12L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
29.4%
5W–12L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert