← Search

Jennifer Carpenter

Colorado Springs, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 32W–27L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Carpenter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-08-20 · LTFCS REED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wen Huang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · MEMPK THORNTON · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelly Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · MEMPK THORNTON · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Wheaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-30 · LTFCS REED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · MEMPK THORNTON · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · LTFCS WISNER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Callender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-26 · MEMPK THORNTON · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-25 · LTFCS WISNER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · LTFCS WISNER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · LTFCS WISNER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · CSRC THORNTON · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelly Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-01 · CSRC THORNTON · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelly Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
40%
6W–9L · 49.6% of games
7.0
61.9%
26W–16L · 53.8% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova