← Search

Kristi Couture

Colorado Springs, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 90W–57L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kristi Couture to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
L
2026-09-03 · FLYHS COUTURE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Canada Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Jessica Kepler / Judy Mitchell
2026-08-27 · FLYHS COUTURE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kady Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · FLYHS COUTURE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kady Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · FLYHS COUTURE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Canada Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · FLYHS COUTURE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kady Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Cathy O'Neill / Nancy Harlow-Irwin
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Maggie Ward championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Tracy Slater championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Maggie Ward championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · FLYHS COUTURE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kady Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · FLYHS COUTURE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheri Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · FLYHS COUTURE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MARY HALABY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · FLYHS COUTURE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tisha Hickerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
65.8%
25W–13L · 55.3% of games
3.5
59.2%
45W–31L · 53.5% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
32 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King