← Search

Janet Burns

Littleton, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 60W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janet Burns to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-06-16 · LEBTC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandi Plude
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-29 · HRCA-N RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cary Peskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · LEBTC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Soderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-30 · LEBTC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Naylon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-23 · LEBTC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Coker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-02 · LEBTC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Naylon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-18 · LEBTC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Warwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-10 · LEBTC SILVER · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandi Plude
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-04 · HRCA-N RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Audino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-05-28 · HRCA-N RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cary Peskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-05-27 · LEBTC SILVER · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Soderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-21 · HRCA-N RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
43.5%
27W–35L · 46.9% of games
7.0
63.5%
33W–19L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe